iPhone 17 – TOP 6 New Upgrades Confirmed!

With the iPhone 17 expected to arrive around September 2025, anticipation is high, but enthusiasm is fading fast. Why? Apple seems to have once again followed its predictable pattern: delay obvious upgrades for years, repackage them with polished branding, and sell them at a premium price. This information is also featured on 9to9trends YouTube, so don’t forget to check it out.

While the Pro and Air models typically steal the spotlight, many users still look toward the standard iPhone for a more accessible option. Unfortunately, based on everything we know so far, the base iPhone 17 looks to be yet another underwhelming iteration, delivering just enough upgrades to sound exciting without actually offering meaningful innovation. Let’s take a hard look at the so-called “new” features and why Apple is, yet again, failing its loyal users.

The 120Hz Display: Welcome to 2021

Apple is finally planning to add a high-refresh-rate display to the regular iPhone — a feature Android manufacturers have offered in mid-range phones for years. But even here, Apple can’t seem to fully commit. Leaks suggest that the display might not be the true variable ProMotion panel found on Pro models. Instead, we might get a display that can scale between 60Hz and 120Hz, or at best 10Hz to 120Hz. Either way, it lacks the dynamic 1Hz–120Hz range that has become standard in flagship phones. This isn’t groundbreaking — it’s basic. The fact that Apple is introducing this in 2025 and expecting applause says everything about how far behind the standard iPhone model has fallen.

And let’s not forget that Apple has stubbornly stuck to a 60Hz display on the non-Pro iPhones for far too long. Users have been vocal about this gap for years, yet the company waited until now to do anything about it. This isn’t innovation. It’s negligence finally being corrected — slowly and minimally.

Table of Contents

Front Camera “Upgrade”: Too Little, Too Late

One of the few upgrades on paper is the front-facing camera, which is reportedly jumping from 12MP to 24MP. Sounds nice, right? Except this level of resolution has been standard in budget Android phones for several years. Apple has used the same 12MP front sensor since the iPhone 14 Pro, and instead of leading the pack, it has chosen to coast along, knowing that its brand loyalty shields it from harsh consumer backlash.

While a better selfie camera might slightly improve video calls or FaceTime quality, it doesn’t fundamentally shift the iPhone 17’s identity. And with AI-enhanced photography already dominating the mobile industry, Apple’s upgrades feel more like checkbox-ticking than forward-thinking design.

Wireless Charging Finally Improves — After Years of Stagnation

The wireless charging story is another case of Apple playing catch-up. The iPhone 17 is rumored to support the new Qi2.2 standard, offering up to 50W wireless charging via MagSafe — a huge leap from the current 15W limit. But let’s be honest: Apple should have made this change years ago. Many Android devices have offered faster wireless charging for at least two or three generations now. Instead of being on the cutting edge, Apple has spent years lagging and is only now starting to show signs of catching up.

USB-C charging is also expected to improve, but again, Apple only recently embraced USB-C after dragging its feet for over a decade with the Lightning port. Apple didn’t lead this transition — it was forced into it by global legislation and consumer pressure.

The C1 Connectivity Chip: Internal Tweaks, External Apathy

Internally, Apple will reportedly include an updated version of its in-house C1 chip, first introduced with the iPhone 16. This chip handles connectivity — including 5G, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth — and might bring some small gains in battery efficiency. But let’s be real: most users won’t notice this at all. It’s an internal optimization being marketed like a major advancement. Apple loves to present these tweaks as monumental shifts, but they are really just the expected result of routine component iteration. No one buys an iPhone just for a slightly better antenna or modem efficiency.

And if this chip helps battery life at all, it’s not because of some miraculous engineering breakthrough — it’s because Apple’s refusal to increase battery capacity across models forces them to rely on software and chip-level tricks to maintain endurance.

A18 Chip in 2025? Unacceptable

Perhaps the most frustrating news about the iPhone 17 is that it will reportedly stick with the A18 chip — the same chip found in the iPhone 16 and 16 Plus. So while Apple will introduce the newer A19 chip in its Pro and Air models, standard users are expected to pay nearly $800 for recycled performance. This is unacceptable in a flagship phone in 2025.

It’s not just disappointing — it’s misleading. Apple has trained customers to expect real hardware upgrades with every new generation. Keeping the same chip as last year’s mid-tier phones contradicts everything a “new” iPhone should represent. Sure, the A18 is still fast by most standards, but this move signals that Apple isn’t serious about innovation across its entire product line — just the ones with “Pro” in the name.

RAM Remains Stuck at 8GB: A Bottleneck in Disguise

To add insult to injury, the iPhone 17 will reportedly feature 8GB of RAM — the same amount as the previous generation. Meanwhile, the Pro and Air models are expected to bump up to 12GB. Apple defenders might argue that iOS doesn’t need more RAM to perform well. But in a world of AI-heavy applications, multitasking, and real-time photo/video editing, this limitation will only age poorly.

Apple’s refusal to increase RAM feels like a deliberate move to keep the iPhone 17 just good enough to sell — but not good enough to prevent users from feeling the need to upgrade sooner. This isn’t just a missed opportunity — it’s part of a broader strategy to throttle base models in subtle but impactful ways.

Price and Release Date: Nothing New, Same High Price

Despite offering mostly incremental updates and re-used hardware, the iPhone 17 will reportedly launch at the same $799 price point as its predecessor. That’s the same cost for a phone with no A19 chip, no RAM bump, and a front camera and display that finally meet industry standards, years late. The release date is expected in mid-September 2025, following Apple’s typical launch timeline. But if you were hoping for a surprise, you’ll be disappointed.

The price tag feels less like a reflection of value and more like a tax on loyalty. Apple knows that many users will buy the iPhone 17 regardless of its limitations, and so it continues to do the bare minimum. The upgrades that are included — the 120Hz screen, better wireless charging, and camera bump — feel more like catch-up mechanics than ambitious innovation.

Final Thoughts: The iPhone 17 Is Playing It Safe — Too Safe

The iPhone 17 is a prime example of Apple’s increasingly cautious product strategy. Instead of pushing boundaries or redefining what a standard smartphone can do, Apple is polishing old parts and presenting them as new. While the improvements might look decent in a spec sheet comparison, they lack vision, risk, and excitement.

For users hoping Apple would finally take the regular iPhone model seriously in 2025, this release is likely to be a letdown. Unless Apple drastically changes course before launch, the iPhone 17 will join a growing list of devices that reflect a company more interested in profit than progress.

SaleBestseller No. 1